3 The order of the quires described by Conev is
wrong. His first quire is actually the third one. His second
and third quires were located in the first part of the
manuscirpt, while his first quire, containing a Menologion
for the end of July and the beginning of August was located
close to the end of then big codex. Therefore, the correct
order is as follows: . The missing 3rd folio of the first
quire (Conev's II quire) is kept as a fragment BAN 4.5.23;
therefore, the first preserved quire of the Manuilev
Apostolos has the following structure: I: 8 (-1-5-6-8).
I: 8 (-1-3-5-6-8) [= B. Conev's II ] + II : 8
(-6) [= B. Conev's III ] + III: 8 (-1-2-3-6-7-8) [=
B.Conev's I ]
There is no quire signatures
preserved.

6 folia of another quire are preserved under the signatures
BAN 24.4.7 (Sreznevskij 54) (-1-2-7-8) and Grig. 15.III
(-1-3-4-5-6-8), that is we have the following quire
structure : 8 (-1-8)?

A bifolio of NBKM 500 seems to ne the outer leaves of a
quire of 8 folia if we consider the text, herefore probably
I:8 (-2-3-4-5-6-7)