3 The order of the quires described by Conev is
wrong. His first quire is actually the third one. His second
and third quires were located in the first part of the
manuscirpt, while his first quire, containing a Menologion
for the end of July and the beginning of August was located
close to the end of then big codex. Therefore, the correct
order is as follows: . The missing 3rd folio of the first
quire (Conev's II quire) is kept as a fragment BAN 4.5.23;
therefore, the first preserved quire of the Manuilev
Apostolos has the following structure: I: 8 (-1-5-6-8).
I: 8 (-1-3-5-6-8) [= B. Conev's II ] + II : 8
(-6) [= B. Conev's III ] + III: 8 (-1-2-3-6-7-8) [=
B.Conev's I ]
There is no quire signatures
preserved.

6 folia of another quire
are preserved under the signatures BAN 24.4.7 (Sreznevskij
54) (-1-2-7-8) and Grig. 15.III (-1-3-4-5-6-8), that is we
have the following quire structure : 8 (-1-8)?

A bifolio of NBKM 500
seems to ne the outer leaves of a quire of 8 folia if we
consider the text, herefore probably I:8
(-2-3-4-5-6-7)